Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeals and allowed the assessee's appeals. It upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions u/s. 68 in respect of unexplained credits, finding the entity was not a shell and there was no incriminating evidence to sustain the addition. With regard to assessment proceedings u/s. 153A and the addition of GP on alleged unaccounted sales, the Tribunal held extrapolation-based estimates unsustainable where no incriminating material supported suppression for the relevant year; accordingly the GP additions were disallowed. The Tribunal noted incriminating evidence existed for AYs 2020-21 and 2021-22 but not for the impugned assessment, resulting in relief to the assessee.
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeals and allowed the assessee's appeals. It upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions u/s. 68 in respect of unexplained credits, finding the entity was not a shell and there was no incriminating evidence to sustain the addition. With regard to assessment proceedings u/s. 153A and the addition of GP on alleged unaccounted sales, the Tribunal held extrapolation-based estimates unsustainable where no incriminating material supported suppression for the relevant year; accordingly the GP additions were disallowed. The Tribunal noted incriminating evidence existed for AYs 2020-21 and 2021-22 but not for the impugned assessment, resulting in relief to the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.