Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT held that the CIT(A)'s enhancement under section 251(1)(a) was impermissible insofar as it sought to assess income from entirely new sources not considered by the AO during assessment; accordingly the tribunal deleted the CIT(A)'s enhancements relating to on-money payments for land purchases and additional on-money attributed to related group entities. Conversely, with respect to additions under section 2(22)(e) for intra-group payments, the ITAT found the AO's arbitrary threshold treating payments over a fixed percentage of sales as loans/advances to be unsustainable; payments shown to be in the ordinary course of business were not taxable as deemed dividends, and the CIT(A)'s deletion of those additions was upheld.
The ITAT held that the CIT(A)'s enhancement under section 251(1)(a) was impermissible insofar as it sought to assess income from entirely new sources not considered by the AO during assessment; accordingly the tribunal deleted the CIT(A)'s enhancements relating to on-money payments for land purchases and additional on-money attributed to related group entities. Conversely, with respect to additions under section 2(22)(e) for intra-group payments, the ITAT found the AO's arbitrary threshold treating payments over a fixed percentage of sales as loans/advances to be unsustainable; payments shown to be in the ordinary course of business were not taxable as deemed dividends, and the CIT(A)'s deletion of those additions was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.