Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT held that the CIT(A)'s enhancement under section 251(1)(a) was impermissible insofar as it sought to assess income from entirely new sources not considered by the AO during assessment; accordingly the tribunal deleted the CIT(A)'s enhancements relating to on-money payments for land purchases and additional on-money attributed to related group entities. Conversely, with respect to additions under section 2(22)(e) for intra-group payments, the ITAT found the AO's arbitrary threshold treating payments over a fixed percentage of sales as loans/advances to be unsustainable; payments shown to be in the ordinary course of business were not taxable as deemed dividends, and the CIT(A)'s deletion of those additions was upheld.
The ITAT held that the CIT(A)'s enhancement under section 251(1)(a) was impermissible insofar as it sought to assess income from entirely new sources not considered by the AO during assessment; accordingly the tribunal deleted the CIT(A)'s enhancements relating to on-money payments for land purchases and additional on-money attributed to related group entities. Conversely, with respect to additions under section 2(22)(e) for intra-group payments, the ITAT found the AO's arbitrary threshold treating payments over a fixed percentage of sales as loans/advances to be unsustainable; payments shown to be in the ordinary course of business were not taxable as deemed dividends, and the CIT(A)'s deletion of those additions was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.