Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The ITAT dismissed the appeal and upheld denial of exemption...
Appeal dismissed: No s.11/s.12 exemption where assessee lacked valid s.12A/12AA/12AB registration for relevant years and statutory filing obligations unmet
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The ITAT dismissed the appeal and upheld denial of exemption under s.11 and s.12, concluding the assessee lacked valid registration under s.12A/12AA/12AB for the relevant assessment years; consequently statutory filing obligations (including Form 9A/10/10B/10BB) and the benefits of s.11(1)(d) could not be availed. The Tribunal held that subsequent grant of registration does not retroactively confer entitlement to exemptions for prior years. Although the assessee's activities fell within the ambit of "advancement of any other object of general public utility," absence of pre-existing registration precluded applicability of s.11/s.12, and all grounds of appeal were dismissed.
The ITAT dismissed the appeal and upheld denial of exemption under s.11 and s.12, concluding the assessee lacked valid registration under s.12A/12AA/12AB for the relevant assessment years; consequently statutory filing obligations (including Form 9A/10/10B/10BB) and the benefits of s.11(1)(d) could not be availed. The Tribunal held that subsequent grant of registration does not retroactively confer entitlement to exemptions for prior years. Although the assessee's activities fell within the ambit of "advancement of any other object of general public utility," absence of pre-existing registration precluded applicability of s.11/s.12, and all grounds of appeal were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
