Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT dismissed the appeals and upheld provisional attachment under the PMLA, holding the relevant date for money-laundering is when alleged proceeds are projected as untainted property (triggering an ECIR) rather than date of acquisition. The Tribunal applied the extended definition of "proceeds of crime," including the second limb (value/equivalent property), rejecting appellants' contention that pre-offence acquisitions are immune where proceeds were allegedly siphoned off. It held ED need not re-investigate predicate offences already subject to police/CBI probe and sustained attachment despite appellants' limited declared assets, finding the quantum of fraud relevant to scheduled offence classification. Appeals dismissed; victim bank permitted to assert its claims; criminal trials unaffected.
The AT dismissed the appeals and upheld provisional attachment under the PMLA, holding the relevant date for money-laundering is when alleged proceeds are projected as untainted property (triggering an ECIR) rather than date of acquisition. The Tribunal applied the extended definition of "proceeds of crime," including the second limb (value/equivalent property), rejecting appellants' contention that pre-offence acquisitions are immune where proceeds were allegedly siphoned off. It held ED need not re-investigate predicate offences already subject to police/CBI probe and sustained attachment despite appellants' limited declared assets, finding the quantum of fraud relevant to scheduled offence classification. Appeals dismissed; victim bank permitted to assert its claims; criminal trials unaffected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
