Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
The HC grants the petitioner bail on execution of a bond of Rs.100,000 with a like surety, subject to satisfaction of the CJM and compliance with imposed conditions. The court held that the alleged offence attracts a maximum sentence of five years and that statutory safeguards under BNSS required issuance of notice under Section 35(3) or, if dispensed with, a written satisfaction recording reasons as mandatorily required by Section 35(1)(b)(ii); the impugned arrest authorization failed to state such reasons. The court applied Apex Court arrest guidelines for offences punishable up to seven years and affirmed concurrent High Court jurisdiction to entertain the bail petition.
The HC grants the petitioner bail on execution of a bond of Rs.100,000 with a like surety, subject to satisfaction of the CJM and compliance with imposed conditions. The court held that the alleged offence attracts a maximum sentence of five years and that statutory safeguards under BNSS required issuance of notice under Section 35(3) or, if dispensed with, a written satisfaction recording reasons as mandatorily required by Section 35(1)(b)(ii); the impugned arrest authorization failed to state such reasons. The court applied Apex Court arrest guidelines for offences punishable up to seven years and affirmed concurrent High Court jurisdiction to entertain the bail petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.