Incomplete BIS testing cannot justify reclassification or confiscatory action; declared customs classification restored and enhanced redemption fine s...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3121 to 3140 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC grants the petitioner bail on execution of a bond of Rs.100,000 with a like surety, subject to satisfaction of the CJM and compliance with imposed conditions. The court held that the alleged offence attracts a maximum sentence of five years and that statutory safeguards under BNSS required issuance of notice under Section 35(3) or, if dispensed with, a written satisfaction recording reasons as mandatorily required by Section 35(1)(b)(ii); the impugned arrest authorization failed to state such reasons. The court applied Apex Court arrest guidelines for offences punishable up to seven years and affirmed concurrent High Court jurisdiction to entertain the bail petition.
The HC grants the petitioner bail on execution of a bond of Rs.100,000 with a like surety, subject to satisfaction of the CJM and compliance with imposed conditions. The court held that the alleged offence attracts a maximum sentence of five years and that statutory safeguards under BNSS required issuance of notice under Section 35(3) or, if dispensed with, a written satisfaction recording reasons as mandatorily required by Section 35(1)(b)(ii); the impugned arrest authorization failed to state such reasons. The court applied Apex Court arrest guidelines for offences punishable up to seven years and affirmed concurrent High Court jurisdiction to entertain the bail petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
