Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the impugned orders issued under s. 130 read with s. 122 of the UP GST Act that had levied tax and penalty on alleged excess stock. The court held the orders unsustainable in law and directed the revenue authority to refund any amounts deposited by the petitioner, with interest at 4% per annum from the date of deposit until refund. The authority must effect the refund within two months of production of a certified copy of the order. The petition is allowed and the enforcement orders are set aside.
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the impugned orders issued under s. 130 read with s. 122 of the UP GST Act that had levied tax and penalty on alleged excess stock. The court held the orders unsustainable in law and directed the revenue authority to refund any amounts deposited by the petitioner, with interest at 4% per annum from the date of deposit until refund. The authority must effect the refund within two months of production of a certified copy of the order. The petition is allowed and the enforcement orders are set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
