Overlapping GST proceedings require Central and State authorities to designate one competent authority for coordinated adjudication of the same matter...
Composite healthcare supplies retain exemption when patient care is the contract's essential character, despite payment through an implementing agency...
Receipt of immovable property requires actual possession or enjoyment; redevelopment allotments exchanged for tenancy rights fall outside deemed incom...
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the impugned orders issued under s. 130 read with s. 122 of the UP GST Act that had levied tax and penalty on alleged excess stock. The court held the orders unsustainable in law and directed the revenue authority to refund any amounts deposited by the petitioner, with interest at 4% per annum from the date of deposit until refund. The authority must effect the refund within two months of production of a certified copy of the order. The petition is allowed and the enforcement orders are set aside.
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the impugned orders issued under s. 130 read with s. 122 of the UP GST Act that had levied tax and penalty on alleged excess stock. The court held the orders unsustainable in law and directed the revenue authority to refund any amounts deposited by the petitioner, with interest at 4% per annum from the date of deposit until refund. The authority must effect the refund within two months of production of a certified copy of the order. The petition is allowed and the enforcement orders are set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
