Retroactive interim-moratorium exclusion permits protective asset disclosure and preservation measures against personal guarantors pending arbitration...
Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the impugned orders issued under s. 130 read with s. 122 of the UP GST Act that had levied tax and penalty on alleged excess stock. The court held the orders unsustainable in law and directed the revenue authority to refund any amounts deposited by the petitioner, with interest at 4% per annum from the date of deposit until refund. The authority must effect the refund within two months of production of a certified copy of the order. The petition is allowed and the enforcement orders are set aside.
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the impugned orders issued under s. 130 read with s. 122 of the UP GST Act that had levied tax and penalty on alleged excess stock. The court held the orders unsustainable in law and directed the revenue authority to refund any amounts deposited by the petitioner, with interest at 4% per annum from the date of deposit until refund. The authority must effect the refund within two months of production of a certified copy of the order. The petition is allowed and the enforcement orders are set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
