Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed the impugned appellate order and allowed the petition by way of remand, holding that the pre-deposit made through the electronic credit ledger constitutes a valid deposit for preferring an appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act. The court rejected the denial of opportunity to rectify any alleged defect in the deposit and directed the appellate authority to decide the appeal afresh in accordance with law, treating the amount paid via the electronic credit ledger as compliant with the pre-deposit requirement. Parties are anonymized as Appellant and Respondent; the matter is remitted for fresh adjudication consistent with this direction.
The HC quashed the impugned appellate order and allowed the petition by way of remand, holding that the pre-deposit made through the electronic credit ledger constitutes a valid deposit for preferring an appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act. The court rejected the denial of opportunity to rectify any alleged defect in the deposit and directed the appellate authority to decide the appeal afresh in accordance with law, treating the amount paid via the electronic credit ledger as compliant with the pre-deposit requirement. Parties are anonymized as Appellant and Respondent; the matter is remitted for fresh adjudication consistent with this direction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.