Depreciation and routine compliance expenses disallowance did not prove inaccurate particulars or misreporting; penalty sustained only on foreign trav...
Page of 4823
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3381 to 3400 of 96456 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the impugned order effectuating retrospective cancellation of the Petitioner's GST registration exceeded the scope of the show-cause notice and violated the audi alteram partem principle by failing to put the Petitioner on notice of retrospective de-registration. Consequently, the cancellation order was quashed insofar as it operated retrospectively, and the HC confined the effective date of cancellation to 31 December 2024, being the date of issuance of the show-cause notice. The petition was allowed and the Petitioner's registration is preserved up to that date, with liberty to contest any further proceedings in accordance with statutory procedure.
The HC held that the impugned order effectuating retrospective cancellation of the Petitioner's GST registration exceeded the scope of the show-cause notice and violated the audi alteram partem principle by failing to put the Petitioner on notice of retrospective de-registration. Consequently, the cancellation order was quashed insofar as it operated retrospectively, and the HC confined the effective date of cancellation to 31 December 2024, being the date of issuance of the show-cause notice. The petition was allowed and the Petitioner's registration is preserved up to that date, with liberty to contest any further proceedings in accordance with statutory procedure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
