Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that the impugned order effectuating retrospective cancellation of the Petitioner's GST registration exceeded the scope of the show-cause notice and violated the audi alteram partem principle by failing to put the Petitioner on notice of retrospective de-registration. Consequently, the cancellation order was quashed insofar as it operated retrospectively, and the HC confined the effective date of cancellation to 31 December 2024, being the date of issuance of the show-cause notice. The petition was allowed and the Petitioner's registration is preserved up to that date, with liberty to contest any further proceedings in accordance with statutory procedure.
The HC held that the impugned order effectuating retrospective cancellation of the Petitioner's GST registration exceeded the scope of the show-cause notice and violated the audi alteram partem principle by failing to put the Petitioner on notice of retrospective de-registration. Consequently, the cancellation order was quashed insofar as it operated retrospectively, and the HC confined the effective date of cancellation to 31 December 2024, being the date of issuance of the show-cause notice. The petition was allowed and the Petitioner's registration is preserved up to that date, with liberty to contest any further proceedings in accordance with statutory procedure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
