Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
Writ petition challenging seizure of goods and imposition of tax and penalty is allowed. The HC quashed the impugned order and, relying on this Court's prior decision and applicable CBIC guidance, directed the respondent to either refund amounts paid by the petitioner or permit adjustment by crediting the petitioner's electronic cash ledger for future tax liability; the order has not been appealed and the issue has attained finality. Consequently, the petitioner is entitled to restitution or tax-credit relief as directed, and the writ issues accordingly.
Writ petition challenging seizure of goods and imposition of tax and penalty is allowed. The HC quashed the impugned order and, relying on this Court's prior decision and applicable CBIC guidance, directed the respondent to either refund amounts paid by the petitioner or permit adjustment by crediting the petitioner's electronic cash ledger for future tax liability; the order has not been appealed and the issue has attained finality. Consequently, the petitioner is entitled to restitution or tax-credit relief as directed, and the writ issues accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.