Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
In penalty proceedings under s.271A for alleged failure to maintain books u/s 44AA arising from derivatives (F&O) trading, ITAT held that the assessee's reliance on ICAI guidance for computing F&O turnover constituted a reasonable cause for non-maintenance of books. The Tribunal found the Income-tax Act lacks specific provisions for F&O turnover computation, accepted the assessee's detailed submissions, and determined that imposition of penalty by the Assessing Officer under s.274 was unjustified. Consequently the penalty was set aside and the assessee's appeal allowed.
In penalty proceedings under s.271A for alleged failure to maintain books u/s 44AA arising from derivatives (F&O) trading, ITAT held that the assessee's reliance on ICAI guidance for computing F&O turnover constituted a reasonable cause for non-maintenance of books. The Tribunal found the Income-tax Act lacks specific provisions for F&O turnover computation, accepted the assessee's detailed submissions, and determined that imposition of penalty by the Assessing Officer under s.274 was unjustified. Consequently the penalty was set aside and the assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.