Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that the appellate bench erred in dismissing the assessee's appeal as non-maintainable under s.249(4)(b) for failure to pay advance tax, observing that advance tax liability must rest on a realistic estimate of income from known sources or prior year returns, and cannot be predicated on contested assessment additions. The CIT(A)'s order was set aside; the matter was remitted to the AO for fresh adjudication of tax liability, noting that the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from appearing earlier. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes and the AO directed to decide afresh in accordance with law.
ITAT held that the appellate bench erred in dismissing the assessee's appeal as non-maintainable under s.249(4)(b) for failure to pay advance tax, observing that advance tax liability must rest on a realistic estimate of income from known sources or prior year returns, and cannot be predicated on contested assessment additions. The CIT(A)'s order was set aside; the matter was remitted to the AO for fresh adjudication of tax liability, noting that the assessee was prevented by sufficient cause from appearing earlier. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes and the AO directed to decide afresh in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.