Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT upheld the order of the CIT(A) and allowed the assessee's appeal, directing deletion of the addition made by the AO under s. 68. The Tribunal found that the three statutory requisites-identity of creditors, genuineness of transactions, and creditworthiness-were satisfactorily established by proximate banking trails, written gift deeds, prior loan repayments as the direct source of funds, and direct responses from the donors to s. 133(6) notices. The AO's reliance on modest declared incomes alone was held legally unsustainable; where documentary and third-party corroboration demonstrates possession of adequate funds, adverse inference is unwarranted. The appeal was allowed.
ITAT upheld the order of the CIT(A) and allowed the assessee's appeal, directing deletion of the addition made by the AO under s. 68. The Tribunal found that the three statutory requisites-identity of creditors, genuineness of transactions, and creditworthiness-were satisfactorily established by proximate banking trails, written gift deeds, prior loan repayments as the direct source of funds, and direct responses from the donors to s. 133(6) notices. The AO's reliance on modest declared incomes alone was held legally unsustainable; where documentary and third-party corroboration demonstrates possession of adequate funds, adverse inference is unwarranted. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.