Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT reversed the AO's capitalisation of interest and certain project-related costs, holding that borrowed funds were actually invested in OFCDs and interest expense is deductible against the resultant interest income (or under s.57(iii) if treated as other income). Advertisement, marketing, brokerage and most legal/professional fees were held revenue in nature and allowable under s.37(1); additions on that account were deleted. A discrete disallowance of legal/professional fees was remitted to the ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication in light of additional evidence filed. No disallowance was warranted under s.14A r.w.r.8D(2)(ii). Addition treating unsold shops as house property was disallowed for the relevant AY, being inconsistent with law prior to s.23(5) amendment.
ITAT reversed the AO's capitalisation of interest and certain project-related costs, holding that borrowed funds were actually invested in OFCDs and interest expense is deductible against the resultant interest income (or under s.57(iii) if treated as other income). Advertisement, marketing, brokerage and most legal/professional fees were held revenue in nature and allowable under s.37(1); additions on that account were deleted. A discrete disallowance of legal/professional fees was remitted to the ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication in light of additional evidence filed. No disallowance was warranted under s.14A r.w.r.8D(2)(ii). Addition treating unsold shops as house property was disallowed for the relevant AY, being inconsistent with law prior to s.23(5) amendment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.