Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The SC allowed the appeal, restored the NCLT's order and set aside the NCLAT's appellate decision. The Court held the company petition under Sections 397/398 of the 1956 Act maintainable, concluding the Appellant proved oppression and mismanagement. The SC affirmed that the NCLT had jurisdiction to adjudicate the validity of the contested gift deed as integral to the oppression complaint. On the merits the Court found the share transfer documents and gift deed tainted by fabrication, overwriting and improper execution, and held the challenged board meetings void for want of valid quorum and mala fide conduct; consequently the impugned transfers and resolutions were declared invalid.
The SC allowed the appeal, restored the NCLT's order and set aside the NCLAT's appellate decision. The Court held the company petition under Sections 397/398 of the 1956 Act maintainable, concluding the Appellant proved oppression and mismanagement. The SC affirmed that the NCLT had jurisdiction to adjudicate the validity of the contested gift deed as integral to the oppression complaint. On the merits the Court found the share transfer documents and gift deed tainted by fabrication, overwriting and improper execution, and held the challenged board meetings void for want of valid quorum and mala fide conduct; consequently the impugned transfers and resolutions were declared invalid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.