Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and dismissed the Revenue's grounds. The Tribunal held that accumulated funds under s.11 were expended in prior assessment years and no accumulated balance remained for application in the year under assessment; the inadvertent inclusion in Schedule I of the ITR for AY 2018-19 resulted from a "punching error." The AO's disallowance, premised on Goetze-based treatment, was rejected because the assessee neither claimed a deduction in the return nor during assessment proceedings based on prior accumulated funds. Consequently, the addition for alleged non-utilisation of accumulated funds was set aside and the Revenue's challenge was dismissed.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and dismissed the Revenue's grounds. The Tribunal held that accumulated funds under s.11 were expended in prior assessment years and no accumulated balance remained for application in the year under assessment; the inadvertent inclusion in Schedule I of the ITR for AY 2018-19 resulted from a "punching error." The AO's disallowance, premised on Goetze-based treatment, was rejected because the assessee neither claimed a deduction in the return nor during assessment proceedings based on prior accumulated funds. Consequently, the addition for alleged non-utilisation of accumulated funds was set aside and the Revenue's challenge was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
