Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and set aside the rejection of approval under s.80G(5)(iii), holding that the error in filing Form No.10AB under the wrong sub-clause was a curable defect and did not permit cancellation or rejection absent dissatisfaction as to genuineness of activities or failure to meet conditions in the proviso. The Tribunal held that where provisional registration in Form No.10AC had issued, the ld. CIT(E) was obliged to inform the assessee and permit rectification rather than reject the application on a mere procedural mistake. The denial of final approval was quashed and the matter remitted for compliance with the rectification procedure consistent with statutory provisos.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and set aside the rejection of approval under s.80G(5)(iii), holding that the error in filing Form No.10AB under the wrong sub-clause was a curable defect and did not permit cancellation or rejection absent dissatisfaction as to genuineness of activities or failure to meet conditions in the proviso. The Tribunal held that where provisional registration in Form No.10AC had issued, the ld. CIT(E) was obliged to inform the assessee and permit rectification rather than reject the application on a mere procedural mistake. The denial of final approval was quashed and the matter remitted for compliance with the rectification procedure consistent with statutory provisos.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.