Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed the appellant's appeal and set aside the impugned order, holding that classification of the imported manganese as "concentrate" lacked evidential foundation. The Tribunal found the department's conclusion that the ore was ground was mere presumption, unsupported by sample testing, expert opinion, or documentary proof; the only established process was washing, which under the HSN does not transform ore into concentrate. Applying the legal principle that the party asserting facts must prove them, CESTAT concluded there was no material to reclassify the goods. Consequently the provisional assessment under section 18(1) stood set aside and the departmental orders were annulled.
CESTAT allowed the appellant's appeal and set aside the impugned order, holding that classification of the imported manganese as "concentrate" lacked evidential foundation. The Tribunal found the department's conclusion that the ore was ground was mere presumption, unsupported by sample testing, expert opinion, or documentary proof; the only established process was washing, which under the HSN does not transform ore into concentrate. Applying the legal principle that the party asserting facts must prove them, CESTAT concluded there was no material to reclassify the goods. Consequently the provisional assessment under section 18(1) stood set aside and the departmental orders were annulled.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.