Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CESTAT allowed the appellant's appeal and set aside the impugned order, holding that classification of the imported manganese as "concentrate" lacked evidential foundation. The Tribunal found the department's conclusion that the ore was ground was mere presumption, unsupported by sample testing, expert opinion, or documentary proof; the only established process was washing, which under the HSN does not transform ore into concentrate. Applying the legal principle that the party asserting facts must prove them, CESTAT concluded there was no material to reclassify the goods. Consequently the provisional assessment under section 18(1) stood set aside and the departmental orders were annulled.
CESTAT allowed the appellant's appeal and set aside the impugned order, holding that classification of the imported manganese as "concentrate" lacked evidential foundation. The Tribunal found the department's conclusion that the ore was ground was mere presumption, unsupported by sample testing, expert opinion, or documentary proof; the only established process was washing, which under the HSN does not transform ore into concentrate. Applying the legal principle that the party asserting facts must prove them, CESTAT concluded there was no material to reclassify the goods. Consequently the provisional assessment under section 18(1) stood set aside and the departmental orders were annulled.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.