Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC held that the amended Article 37 remains lawful and enforceable inter se shareholders. Transfers of shares in contravention of the Articles to outsiders are void, but there was no evidence substantiating cancellation of the appellants' shareholdings or their consequent removal as directors; those directions were unsustainable. The impugned order of 5 June 2009 was modified: the transfers to appellant nos.1,2,4 and 5 are declared valid and their appointments as directors are affirmed. Following the deaths of certain original shareholders, shares may be transmitted only to legal heirs; such heirs are granted liberty to apply to the company under Article 41 to effect transmission. Questions of law were answered in the company's best interests and the application is disposed.
HC held that the amended Article 37 remains lawful and enforceable inter se shareholders. Transfers of shares in contravention of the Articles to outsiders are void, but there was no evidence substantiating cancellation of the appellants' shareholdings or their consequent removal as directors; those directions were unsustainable. The impugned order of 5 June 2009 was modified: the transfers to appellant nos.1,2,4 and 5 are declared valid and their appointments as directors are affirmed. Following the deaths of certain original shareholders, shares may be transmitted only to legal heirs; such heirs are granted liberty to apply to the company under Article 41 to effect transmission. Questions of law were answered in the company's best interests and the application is disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.