Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT dismissed the appeal filed by the Appellant and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, holding that the respondent was entitled to the exemption notification for "all items of machinery required for setting up of solar power generation," which sufficiently includes module mounting structures. The Tribunal applied the principle that exemption notifications are strictly construed to determine ambit but liberally applied when entitlement is established. The inclusive examples do not restrict the main definition. Procedural non-compliance in failing to produce a certificate at clearance was remedied by subsequent production; substantive benefit could not be denied for bureaucratic delay. The impugned order is affirmed and the appeal is dismissed.
CESTAT dismissed the appeal filed by the Appellant and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, holding that the respondent was entitled to the exemption notification for "all items of machinery required for setting up of solar power generation," which sufficiently includes module mounting structures. The Tribunal applied the principle that exemption notifications are strictly construed to determine ambit but liberally applied when entitlement is established. The inclusive examples do not restrict the main definition. Procedural non-compliance in failing to produce a certificate at clearance was remedied by subsequent production; substantive benefit could not be denied for bureaucratic delay. The impugned order is affirmed and the appeal is dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.