Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The HC dismissed the writ petition as premature and granted the petitioner liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Government Circular dated 11.07.2024; the petitioner is directed to furnish the prescribed pre-deposit under Section 112(8) of the CGST Act and the requisite undertaking/affidavit within two weeks. Upon such compliance and on filing the undertaking that an appeal will be prosecuted when the Appellate Tribunal is constituted, recovery of the balance confirmed demand shall remain stayed under Section 112(9) of the CGST Act. The respondents raised no objection to this route and the petition is disposed of accordingly.
The HC dismissed the writ petition as premature and granted the petitioner liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Government Circular dated 11.07.2024; the petitioner is directed to furnish the prescribed pre-deposit under Section 112(8) of the CGST Act and the requisite undertaking/affidavit within two weeks. Upon such compliance and on filing the undertaking that an appeal will be prosecuted when the Appellate Tribunal is constituted, recovery of the balance confirmed demand shall remain stayed under Section 112(9) of the CGST Act. The respondents raised no objection to this route and the petition is disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
