Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the writ petition as premature and granted the petitioner liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Government Circular dated 11.07.2024; the petitioner is directed to furnish the prescribed pre-deposit under Section 112(8) of the CGST Act and the requisite undertaking/affidavit within two weeks. Upon such compliance and on filing the undertaking that an appeal will be prosecuted when the Appellate Tribunal is constituted, recovery of the balance confirmed demand shall remain stayed under Section 112(9) of the CGST Act. The respondents raised no objection to this route and the petition is disposed of accordingly.
The HC dismissed the writ petition as premature and granted the petitioner liberty to file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal in accordance with Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Government Circular dated 11.07.2024; the petitioner is directed to furnish the prescribed pre-deposit under Section 112(8) of the CGST Act and the requisite undertaking/affidavit within two weeks. Upon such compliance and on filing the undertaking that an appeal will be prosecuted when the Appellate Tribunal is constituted, recovery of the balance confirmed demand shall remain stayed under Section 112(9) of the CGST Act. The respondents raised no objection to this route and the petition is disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
