Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Vicarious liability for dishonoured company cheques may extend to non-signatory directors where complaints contain foundational responsibility avermen...
The HC set aside the impugned order of retrospective...
Retrospective GST registration cancellation set aside; authority must allow reply and reconsideration, petitioner permitted to respond by 15 October 2025
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The HC set aside the impugned order of retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration, finding that retrospective cancellation is unsustainable where the show-cause notice did not contemplate retrospective effect and principles of natural justice were infringed by the petitioner's failure to file a reply and to avail personal hearing. The court reiterated its established view that retrospective withdrawal of registration cannot be upheld absent explicit notice. The matter is remitted for reconsideration: the petitioner is permitted to file a reply to the SCN by 15 October 2025, after which the authority shall proceed in accordance with law. Petition allowed and impugned order dated 22 November 2024 set aside.
The HC set aside the impugned order of retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration, finding that retrospective cancellation is unsustainable where the show-cause notice did not contemplate retrospective effect and principles of natural justice were infringed by the petitioner's failure to file a reply and to avail personal hearing. The court reiterated its established view that retrospective withdrawal of registration cannot be upheld absent explicit notice. The matter is remitted for reconsideration: the petitioner is permitted to file a reply to the SCN by 15 October 2025, after which the authority shall proceed in accordance with law. Petition allowed and impugned order dated 22 November 2024 set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
