Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
The HC set aside the impugned order of retrospective...
Retrospective GST registration cancellation set aside; authority must allow reply and reconsideration, petitioner permitted to respond by 15 October 2025
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
The HC set aside the impugned order of retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration, finding that retrospective cancellation is unsustainable where the show-cause notice did not contemplate retrospective effect and principles of natural justice were infringed by the petitioner's failure to file a reply and to avail personal hearing. The court reiterated its established view that retrospective withdrawal of registration cannot be upheld absent explicit notice. The matter is remitted for reconsideration: the petitioner is permitted to file a reply to the SCN by 15 October 2025, after which the authority shall proceed in accordance with law. Petition allowed and impugned order dated 22 November 2024 set aside.
The HC set aside the impugned order of retrospective cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration, finding that retrospective cancellation is unsustainable where the show-cause notice did not contemplate retrospective effect and principles of natural justice were infringed by the petitioner's failure to file a reply and to avail personal hearing. The court reiterated its established view that retrospective withdrawal of registration cannot be upheld absent explicit notice. The matter is remitted for reconsideration: the petitioner is permitted to file a reply to the SCN by 15 October 2025, after which the authority shall proceed in accordance with law. Petition allowed and impugned order dated 22 November 2024 set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
