Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
ITAT held that surrender proceeds of a Unit Linked Insurance Policy constitute a "capital asset" within section 2(14) and directed the AO to assess accruals on surrender under the head "capital gains" with allowance for indexation, rejecting taxation as "income from other sources." The Tribunal observed that provisos to section 10(10D) effective 01.04.2021 are inapplicable to the assessment year in issue and that mere deduction of TDS does not determine the nature of the receipt. The AO is directed to re-assess the receipt as capital gains and to grant credit for TDS as reflected in Form 26AS when giving effect to this order.
ITAT held that surrender proceeds of a Unit Linked Insurance Policy constitute a "capital asset" within section 2(14) and directed the AO to assess accruals on surrender under the head "capital gains" with allowance for indexation, rejecting taxation as "income from other sources." The Tribunal observed that provisos to section 10(10D) effective 01.04.2021 are inapplicable to the assessment year in issue and that mere deduction of TDS does not determine the nature of the receipt. The AO is directed to re-assess the receipt as capital gains and to grant credit for TDS as reflected in Form 26AS when giving effect to this order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.