Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the petition and upheld imposition of a penalty of approximately Rs. 2.10 crores against the petitioner (a chartered accountant) for issuing 15CA certificates that facilitated foreign remittances in excess of Rs. 100 crores without requisite tax deduction. The court found the petitioner failed to demonstrate exhaustion of alternate remedies by way of appeal and rejected the asserted inability to make the statutory 7.5% pre-deposit as a bona fide impediment, concluding it was a collateral plea to avoid pre-deposit. In view of applicable precedent and the petitioner's deficient affidavits, the petition was not entertained and stands dismissed.
The HC dismissed the petition and upheld imposition of a penalty of approximately Rs. 2.10 crores against the petitioner (a chartered accountant) for issuing 15CA certificates that facilitated foreign remittances in excess of Rs. 100 crores without requisite tax deduction. The court found the petitioner failed to demonstrate exhaustion of alternate remedies by way of appeal and rejected the asserted inability to make the statutory 7.5% pre-deposit as a bona fide impediment, concluding it was a collateral plea to avoid pre-deposit. In view of applicable precedent and the petitioner's deficient affidavits, the petition was not entertained and stands dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.