Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the petition and upheld imposition of a penalty of approximately Rs. 2.10 crores against the petitioner (a chartered accountant) for issuing 15CA certificates that facilitated foreign remittances in excess of Rs. 100 crores without requisite tax deduction. The court found the petitioner failed to demonstrate exhaustion of alternate remedies by way of appeal and rejected the asserted inability to make the statutory 7.5% pre-deposit as a bona fide impediment, concluding it was a collateral plea to avoid pre-deposit. In view of applicable precedent and the petitioner's deficient affidavits, the petition was not entertained and stands dismissed.
The HC dismissed the petition and upheld imposition of a penalty of approximately Rs. 2.10 crores against the petitioner (a chartered accountant) for issuing 15CA certificates that facilitated foreign remittances in excess of Rs. 100 crores without requisite tax deduction. The court found the petitioner failed to demonstrate exhaustion of alternate remedies by way of appeal and rejected the asserted inability to make the statutory 7.5% pre-deposit as a bona fide impediment, concluding it was a collateral plea to avoid pre-deposit. In view of applicable precedent and the petitioner's deficient affidavits, the petition was not entertained and stands dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
