Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the recovery citation issued under Section 79(1)(c) of the CGST Act, holding that recovery initiated during the pendency of a statutory appeal filed under Section 107 is unsustainable where the appellant complied with the pre-deposit requirement of Section 107(6). The court found that the petitioner had filed the appeal within the limitation period prescribed by Section 107(4) and had deposited 10% of the disputed tax as mandated, thereby drawing the settled rule that recovery of the balance demand is stayed pending disposal of the appeal. The impugned recovery citation dated 05.08.2025 is set aside and the petition is disposed.
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the recovery citation issued under Section 79(1)(c) of the CGST Act, holding that recovery initiated during the pendency of a statutory appeal filed under Section 107 is unsustainable where the appellant complied with the pre-deposit requirement of Section 107(6). The court found that the petitioner had filed the appeal within the limitation period prescribed by Section 107(4) and had deposited 10% of the disputed tax as mandated, thereby drawing the settled rule that recovery of the balance demand is stayed pending disposal of the appeal. The impugned recovery citation dated 05.08.2025 is set aside and the petition is disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
