Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the recovery citation issued under Section 79(1)(c) of the CGST Act, holding that recovery initiated during the pendency of a statutory appeal filed under Section 107 is unsustainable where the appellant complied with the pre-deposit requirement of Section 107(6). The court found that the petitioner had filed the appeal within the limitation period prescribed by Section 107(4) and had deposited 10% of the disputed tax as mandated, thereby drawing the settled rule that recovery of the balance demand is stayed pending disposal of the appeal. The impugned recovery citation dated 05.08.2025 is set aside and the petition is disposed.
The HC allowed the petition and quashed the recovery citation issued under Section 79(1)(c) of the CGST Act, holding that recovery initiated during the pendency of a statutory appeal filed under Section 107 is unsustainable where the appellant complied with the pre-deposit requirement of Section 107(6). The court found that the petitioner had filed the appeal within the limitation period prescribed by Section 107(4) and had deposited 10% of the disputed tax as mandated, thereby drawing the settled rule that recovery of the balance demand is stayed pending disposal of the appeal. The impugned recovery citation dated 05.08.2025 is set aside and the petition is disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
