Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT accepted the Senior Standing Counsel's legal opinion and held that claims/benefits unquantified due to non-submission of documents by the pre-resolution entity stand extinguished, and the resolution applicant cannot be held liable for the pre-approval failure to pass input tax credit under s.171 CGST Act. Finding no reasonable cause to proceed, the AT closed the s.171 proceedings, set aside the DGAP notice and discharged the resolution applicant from accountability for the predecessor's omission to transfer ITC benefits post-approval of the resolution plan. The Pr. DG's queries and the opinion relied upon were treated as determinative, resulting in final cessation of the contested recovery action.
The AT accepted the Senior Standing Counsel's legal opinion and held that claims/benefits unquantified due to non-submission of documents by the pre-resolution entity stand extinguished, and the resolution applicant cannot be held liable for the pre-approval failure to pass input tax credit under s.171 CGST Act. Finding no reasonable cause to proceed, the AT closed the s.171 proceedings, set aside the DGAP notice and discharged the resolution applicant from accountability for the predecessor's omission to transfer ITC benefits post-approval of the resolution plan. The Pr. DG's queries and the opinion relied upon were treated as determinative, resulting in final cessation of the contested recovery action.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.