Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT restored the assessee's appeal to the file of the ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication concerning interest and penalty alleged to have arisen from late deposit of TDS for Q3 A.Y. 2021-22, noting that factual and legal issues surrounding timely tendering of the TDS cheque to the bank and subsequent levy under s. 201(1A) require effective examination. The Tribunal did not decide the merits but directed de novo consideration by the CIT(A) and imposed a litigation cost of Rs.1,000 payable by the assessee. The matter is remitted for fresh decision on both liability for interest and imposition of penalty.
ITAT restored the assessee's appeal to the file of the ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication concerning interest and penalty alleged to have arisen from late deposit of TDS for Q3 A.Y. 2021-22, noting that factual and legal issues surrounding timely tendering of the TDS cheque to the bank and subsequent levy under s. 201(1A) require effective examination. The Tribunal did not decide the merits but directed de novo consideration by the CIT(A) and imposed a litigation cost of Rs.1,000 payable by the assessee. The matter is remitted for fresh decision on both liability for interest and imposition of penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.