Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed appeal and directed deletion of LTGC addition for A.Y. 2014-15, holding that the assessee, described in the development agreement as the "Consenting Party," did not receive any consideration under the agreement and possessed no proprietary or beneficial rights in the subject property per the purchase deed and development agreement. The Tribunal found no evidence, nor did the Revenue rebut, that any amount accrued or was received by the assessee from the stated sale consideration. Consequently, no capital gain accrued to the assessee and the Assessing Officer's addition for long-term capital gain was unsustainable and must be deleted.
ITAT allowed appeal and directed deletion of LTGC addition for A.Y. 2014-15, holding that the assessee, described in the development agreement as the "Consenting Party," did not receive any consideration under the agreement and possessed no proprietary or beneficial rights in the subject property per the purchase deed and development agreement. The Tribunal found no evidence, nor did the Revenue rebut, that any amount accrued or was received by the assessee from the stated sale consideration. Consequently, no capital gain accrued to the assessee and the Assessing Officer's addition for long-term capital gain was unsustainable and must be deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
