Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal and affirmed deletion of penalty under s. 271AAB as levied against the assessee. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s factual finding that no search under s. 132 was conducted in the assessee's case; the impugned section predicates penalty liability on initiation of a search. Although the assessee purportedly disclosed the mode of earning the undisclosed income, he had not paid tax for the specified period, but that procedural deficiency does not engage s. 271AAB absent a search. Revenue failed to rebut the finding of no search; accordingly the penalty under s. 271AAB was not sustainable and the appeal was dismissed.
The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal and affirmed deletion of penalty under s. 271AAB as levied against the assessee. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s factual finding that no search under s. 132 was conducted in the assessee's case; the impugned section predicates penalty liability on initiation of a search. Although the assessee purportedly disclosed the mode of earning the undisclosed income, he had not paid tax for the specified period, but that procedural deficiency does not engage s. 271AAB absent a search. Revenue failed to rebut the finding of no search; accordingly the penalty under s. 271AAB was not sustainable and the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.