Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, a public charitable trust registered under sections 12A/12AA and claiming exemption under section 11, holding that the sum of Rs.31,34,000 accumulated and earmarked by the trust (via Form 10) for building construction and retained in its current account with a public sector bank constituted a permissible mode of accumulation/investment for purposes of section 11(2). The AO's denial of exemption on the ground that a current account is not a prescribed mode under section 11(5), and the NFAC's affirmation, were set aside; the accumulated amount was treated as properly invested/classified and exempt under section 11(2).
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, a public charitable trust registered under sections 12A/12AA and claiming exemption under section 11, holding that the sum of Rs.31,34,000 accumulated and earmarked by the trust (via Form 10) for building construction and retained in its current account with a public sector bank constituted a permissible mode of accumulation/investment for purposes of section 11(2). The AO's denial of exemption on the ground that a current account is not a prescribed mode under section 11(5), and the NFAC's affirmation, were set aside; the accumulated amount was treated as properly invested/classified and exempt under section 11(2).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.