Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The ITAT held that the time limit for filing Form 67 under Rule 128(9) is directory; where the taxpayer filed Form 67 during the pendency of the appeal before the CIT(A), the foreign tax credit should have been allowed. The matter is remitted to the AO to verify the claim and, if found in order, grant the foreign tax credit after due compliance. On carry-forward, the ITAT held that unabsorbed depreciation does not constitute a "business loss" for the relevant AY; the AO is directed to allow carry-forward losses for the earlier year in accordance with law after affording the assessee an opportunity of hearing. Ground No.3 allowed.
The ITAT held that the time limit for filing Form 67 under Rule 128(9) is directory; where the taxpayer filed Form 67 during the pendency of the appeal before the CIT(A), the foreign tax credit should have been allowed. The matter is remitted to the AO to verify the claim and, if found in order, grant the foreign tax credit after due compliance. On carry-forward, the ITAT held that unabsorbed depreciation does not constitute a "business loss" for the relevant AY; the AO is directed to allow carry-forward losses for the earlier year in accordance with law after affording the assessee an opportunity of hearing. Ground No.3 allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
