Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the Tribunal's scrutiny of the interim resolution professional's conduct in reconstituting the committee of creditors. The IRP had initially constituted the CoC on 21.08.2024 and filed under Regulation 17, but subsequently reconstituted the CoC by excluding two major financial creditors and reducing membership to a single member holding 0.18% voting share, a manoeuvre the Tribunal deemed mischievous and beyond acceptable exercise of authority. The Appellate Tribunal declined to set aside the Tribunal's well-considered directions or to interfere with disposal of IAs concerning the matter, and held that the additional applicant lacked independent grounds to sustain the appeal.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the Tribunal's scrutiny of the interim resolution professional's conduct in reconstituting the committee of creditors. The IRP had initially constituted the CoC on 21.08.2024 and filed under Regulation 17, but subsequently reconstituted the CoC by excluding two major financial creditors and reducing membership to a single member holding 0.18% voting share, a manoeuvre the Tribunal deemed mischievous and beyond acceptable exercise of authority. The Appellate Tribunal declined to set aside the Tribunal's well-considered directions or to interfere with disposal of IAs concerning the matter, and held that the additional applicant lacked independent grounds to sustain the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
