Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT allowed the appeal in part. The Tribunal found that Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, acting through their director and authorised representative, caused foreign exchange loss of Rs. 23,63,89,843 and procured assets abroad worth Rs. 4,89,69,850 by contravening FEMA provisions; their conduct amounted to masterminding the contraventions. The penalty previously imposed on Respondent No. 1 is maintained subject to the outcome of any cross-appeal. The penalties on Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are enhanced to Rs. 1,00,00,000 each on parity grounds. The decision affirms liability findings against all respondents and increases monetary sanctions against Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
The AT allowed the appeal in part. The Tribunal found that Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, acting through their director and authorised representative, caused foreign exchange loss of Rs. 23,63,89,843 and procured assets abroad worth Rs. 4,89,69,850 by contravening FEMA provisions; their conduct amounted to masterminding the contraventions. The penalty previously imposed on Respondent No. 1 is maintained subject to the outcome of any cross-appeal. The penalties on Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are enhanced to Rs. 1,00,00,000 each on parity grounds. The decision affirms liability findings against all respondents and increases monetary sanctions against Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
