PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
The AT allowed the appeal in part. The Tribunal found that Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, acting through their director and authorised representative, caused foreign exchange loss of Rs. 23,63,89,843 and procured assets abroad worth Rs. 4,89,69,850 by contravening FEMA provisions; their conduct amounted to masterminding the contraventions. The penalty previously imposed on Respondent No. 1 is maintained subject to the outcome of any cross-appeal. The penalties on Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are enhanced to Rs. 1,00,00,000 each on parity grounds. The decision affirms liability findings against all respondents and increases monetary sanctions against Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
The AT allowed the appeal in part. The Tribunal found that Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, acting through their director and authorised representative, caused foreign exchange loss of Rs. 23,63,89,843 and procured assets abroad worth Rs. 4,89,69,850 by contravening FEMA provisions; their conduct amounted to masterminding the contraventions. The penalty previously imposed on Respondent No. 1 is maintained subject to the outcome of any cross-appeal. The penalties on Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are enhanced to Rs. 1,00,00,000 each on parity grounds. The decision affirms liability findings against all respondents and increases monetary sanctions against Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
