Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
The AT allowed the appeal in part. The Tribunal found that Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, acting through their director and authorised representative, caused foreign exchange loss of Rs. 23,63,89,843 and procured assets abroad worth Rs. 4,89,69,850 by contravening FEMA provisions; their conduct amounted to masterminding the contraventions. The penalty previously imposed on Respondent No. 1 is maintained subject to the outcome of any cross-appeal. The penalties on Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are enhanced to Rs. 1,00,00,000 each on parity grounds. The decision affirms liability findings against all respondents and increases monetary sanctions against Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
The AT allowed the appeal in part. The Tribunal found that Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, acting through their director and authorised representative, caused foreign exchange loss of Rs. 23,63,89,843 and procured assets abroad worth Rs. 4,89,69,850 by contravening FEMA provisions; their conduct amounted to masterminding the contraventions. The penalty previously imposed on Respondent No. 1 is maintained subject to the outcome of any cross-appeal. The penalties on Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are enhanced to Rs. 1,00,00,000 each on parity grounds. The decision affirms liability findings against all respondents and increases monetary sanctions against Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
