Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D. The Tribunal found the AO validly computed disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) on investments alone, notwithstanding absence of a proportional interest disallowance, and rejected the assessee's challenge to the AO's application of mind and alleged failure to record satisfaction. The Tribunal further held that, post-amendment, the assessee was obliged to compute suo moto disallowance even if no exempt income arose, which it failed to do. No infirmity was found in the CIT(A)'s order; the AO's computation under Rule 8D was affirmed and the assessee's appeal dismissed.
ITAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D. The Tribunal found the AO validly computed disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) on investments alone, notwithstanding absence of a proportional interest disallowance, and rejected the assessee's challenge to the AO's application of mind and alleged failure to record satisfaction. The Tribunal further held that, post-amendment, the assessee was obliged to compute suo moto disallowance even if no exempt income arose, which it failed to do. No infirmity was found in the CIT(A)'s order; the AO's computation under Rule 8D was affirmed and the assessee's appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
