Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT held for the Appellant that the imported black sand is properly classifiable as mineral/ore under CTH 2614 0090 rather than as quartz sand under CTH 2505 1020, applying GRI Rule 3(b) because rutile (25-30%) imparts the essential character and Chapter 2505 excludes metal-bearing sands. The Tribunal found no legal basis to reject the declared transaction value on the basis of an unexplained contemporaneous import, noting absence of comparability analysis (quality, quantity, origin, commercial factors) or communication under the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. Confiscation, redemption fine and penalties were held unsustainable and set aside. Appeal allowed; impugned orders quashed accordingly.
CESTAT held for the Appellant that the imported black sand is properly classifiable as mineral/ore under CTH 2614 0090 rather than as quartz sand under CTH 2505 1020, applying GRI Rule 3(b) because rutile (25-30%) imparts the essential character and Chapter 2505 excludes metal-bearing sands. The Tribunal found no legal basis to reject the declared transaction value on the basis of an unexplained contemporaneous import, noting absence of comparability analysis (quality, quantity, origin, commercial factors) or communication under the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007. Confiscation, redemption fine and penalties were held unsustainable and set aside. Appeal allowed; impugned orders quashed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.