Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC quashed the Central Government's order directing SFIO to investigate the anonymized company and its subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates under section 212(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, and set aside all consequential proceedings. The Court held the impugned order suffered from non-application of mind, contained apparent misstatements and lacked demonstrable circumstances necessary to form the statutory opinion; it also noted the Government's failure to undertake an inspection despite a prior inquiry under section 206(4)/(5). Given the absence of requisite material and failure to consider relevant circumstances, the petition was allowed and the order dated 05.09.2024 was quashed.
The HC quashed the Central Government's order directing SFIO to investigate the anonymized company and its subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates under section 212(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, and set aside all consequential proceedings. The Court held the impugned order suffered from non-application of mind, contained apparent misstatements and lacked demonstrable circumstances necessary to form the statutory opinion; it also noted the Government's failure to undertake an inspection despite a prior inquiry under section 206(4)/(5). Given the absence of requisite material and failure to consider relevant circumstances, the petition was allowed and the order dated 05.09.2024 was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
