Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT upholds admission of the Section 95 application by the financial creditor and affirms enforceability of the personal guarantee executed on 02.03.2016. The Tribunal found cogent bank records, including bank statements and a promissory note, establish that credit facilities aggregating Rs. 44 crore were disbursed to the corporate borrower and that the guarantee was supported by consideration. The appellant's contention that no subsequent disbursal or pending DRT counterclaim precluded initiation of Section 95 proceedings was rejected. NCLAT declined to interfere with the adjudicating authority's order admitting the Section 95 application, noting the appellant remains free to advance a repayment proposal before the resolution professional in accordance with law.
NCLAT upholds admission of the Section 95 application by the financial creditor and affirms enforceability of the personal guarantee executed on 02.03.2016. The Tribunal found cogent bank records, including bank statements and a promissory note, establish that credit facilities aggregating Rs. 44 crore were disbursed to the corporate borrower and that the guarantee was supported by consideration. The appellant's contention that no subsequent disbursal or pending DRT counterclaim precluded initiation of Section 95 proceedings was rejected. NCLAT declined to interfere with the adjudicating authority's order admitting the Section 95 application, noting the appellant remains free to advance a repayment proposal before the resolution professional in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
