Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
SC allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned judgments of the High Court and the revisional court, and restored the criminal proceedings under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to the learned Magistrate. The Court held that SICA Section 22 does not per se bar prosecution under Section 138; where a Section 22A restraint operates, its effect is factual and depends on whether the restraint prevents disbursements for day-to-day operations. On the facts, the restraint did not preclude issuance of the cheques to discharge liabilities for supplies, and the revisional court erred in recalling processes; factual issues, including rebuttal of statutory presumptions as to cheque issuance, remain for trial.
SC allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned judgments of the High Court and the revisional court, and restored the criminal proceedings under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to the learned Magistrate. The Court held that SICA Section 22 does not per se bar prosecution under Section 138; where a Section 22A restraint operates, its effect is factual and depends on whether the restraint prevents disbursements for day-to-day operations. On the facts, the restraint did not preclude issuance of the cheques to discharge liabilities for supplies, and the revisional court erred in recalling processes; factual issues, including rebuttal of statutory presumptions as to cheque issuance, remain for trial.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.