Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
HC held that where a petitioner deposited amounts under section 71 of the State GST Act, 2017 and allegations of fraud and willful misstatement or suppression of facts arose, any deposit found to be in excess shall not be refunded immediately but may be adjusted at final adjudication or set off against any amounts found due in the petitioner's favour. The court directed that invoking authorities must proceed expeditiously with post-inspection adjudicatory steps under section 71 in accordance with the statutory scheme. The petition is disposed of with the above directions.
HC held that where a petitioner deposited amounts under section 71 of the State GST Act, 2017 and allegations of fraud and willful misstatement or suppression of facts arose, any deposit found to be in excess shall not be refunded immediately but may be adjusted at final adjudication or set off against any amounts found due in the petitioner's favour. The court directed that invoking authorities must proceed expeditiously with post-inspection adjudicatory steps under section 71 in accordance with the statutory scheme. The petition is disposed of with the above directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
